[NBLUG/talk] Recent PHP version on Centos 6.5

Steve Johnson fratm at adnd.com
Fri Sep 12 08:25:25 PDT 2014


How do you know if someone is an Arch Linux user?  They tell you..
 Biggest batch of fan boys in the Linux community.

-S


On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Zack Gold <zg at nblug.org> wrote:

> As an Arch Linux user, I suggest you switch to Arch Linux, because the
> other distributions are bad.
>
> With that said (and firing off an entirely new set of emails), check out
> the distributions page at LWN.net.  Yeah, there's a lot of info, but if you
> read through descriptions of distributions carefully one day, you'll be
> able to move forward with a flavor that you like for years.
> http://lwn.net/Distributions/
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Omar Eljumaily <omar at omnicode.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  I'm not sure what the difference between "enterprise" and normal
>> business/commercial use is.  It's really hard to define servers based on
>> application space these days, though, because of the cloud and
>> virtualization.
>>
>> In the past, I think Ubuntu wasn't considered serious for business, but
>> they are very aggressively going after that sector now.  I've come to the
>> conclusion that Redhat's relationship with Centos is problematic.  I get
>> the distinct impression that there's not a push to fine tune things to make
>> it easy for end users.
>>
>> An example of what I'm talking about is SELinux.  Nothing useful on
>> Centos works out of the box when you're running SELinux.  You have to tweak
>> and modify things like crazy.  The last server I set up had about 100
>> custom SELinux rules.  I've found that AppArmor on Ubuntu is much more
>> tenable.
>>
>> Just my take.
>>
>> Omar
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/11/2014 11:55 PM, Zack Gold wrote:
>>
>> In all seriousness, you should only be using CentOS if you're doing
>> enterprise work, from what I've read.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Jordan Erickson <
>> jerickson at logicalnetworking.net> wrote:
>>
>>> What's heavier - a metric crapton of educational links, or a metric
>>> crapton of e-mails?
>>>
>>>
>>> Jordan Erickson (PGP: 0x78DD41CB)
>>> LNS: 707-636-5678, http://logicalnetworking.net
>>>
>>> On 09/11/2014 12:45 PM, Steve S. wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Allan Cecil <ac at sonic.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Ignore Zack, he's trolling. :)
>>> > And here I was, about to drop a metric crapton of educational links on
>>> > him...  ;-)
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > talk mailing list
>>> > talk at nblug.org
>>> > http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at nblug.org
>>> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Zack Gold
>> Former NBLUG Scribe
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing listtalk at nblug.orghttp://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at nblug.org
>> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Zack Gold
> Former NBLUG Scribe
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at nblug.org
> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nblug.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140912/cb5f268c/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list