[NBLUG/talk] Changed Network

[Micxz]

I'm reading the post a bit more closely and I suppose this tool will not 
help in this case' But It is still a cool tool`

--
Micxz

> 
> Here is a cool tool:
> 
> 
> http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=amanda.corporate-image.com 
> 
> http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=corporate-image.com
> 
> -- 
> Micxz
> 
>  > Walter Hansen wrote:
> 
>> It is complex outgoing email is set to use name at corporate-image.com where
>> the server is amanda.corporate-image.com
>>
>> I remember this being a nightmare to set up.
>>
>> any suggestions where to start (from logs:)
>>
>> Apr 25 13:18:35 amanda sendmail[956]: i3PKGZ1B000956:
>> from=<root at corporate-image.com>, size=491, class=0, nrcpts=0, 
>> proto=ESMTP,
>> daemon=MTA, relay=amanda [127
>> .0.0.1]
>> Apr 25 13:18:35 amanda sendmail[956]: i3PKGZ1C000956: ruleset=check_mail,
>> arg1=<root at corporate-image.com>, relay=amanda [127.0.0.1], reject=451
>> 4.1.8 Domain o
>> f sender address root at corporate-image.com does not resolve
>> Apr 25 13:18:35 amanda sm-msp-queue[948]: i3Q9H7Un001982:
>> to=<root at localhost.localdomain>, ctladdr=<root at localhost.localdomain>
>> (0/0), delay=-12:-58:-32, xdel
>> ay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=2550274, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0,
>> stat=Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address 
>> root at corporate-image.com
>> does not reso
>> lve
>> Apr 25 13:18:59 amanda sendmail[953]: i3PKGF1A000953:
>> from=<root at corporate-image.com>, size=491, class=0, nrcpts=0, 
>> proto=ESMTP,
>> daemon=MTA, relay=amanda [127
>> .0.0.1]
>>
>>
>>
>>> Now I'm having sendmail problems (mailq):
>>>
>>> i3LLpbAa001426     3162 Wed Apr 21 14:52 <>
>>>                 (host map: lookup (corporate-image.com): deferred)
>>>                     <support at corporate-image.com>
>>> i3LLobAa001421     3162 Wed Apr 21 14:51 <>
>>>                 (host map: lookup (corporate-image.com): deferred)
>>>                     <support at corporate-image.com>
>>>              Total requests: 230
>>>
>>> and wu-ftp is not responding. Crap.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:05:31PM -0700, Walter Hansen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I did finally change over the network entirely to the 192.168.33.0
>>>>> network and now route is really slow at showing the default route for
>>>>> the two servers. Everything else pops up quickly, but default route
>>>>> hangs for
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How does "route -n" perform?
>>>> -- 
>>>> Eric Eisenhart
>>>> NBLUG Co-Founder & Director-At-Large
>>>> The North Bay Linux Users Group
>>>> http://nblug.org/
>>>> eric at nblug.org, IRC: Freiheit at freenode, AIM: falschfreiheit, ICQ:
>>>> 48217244
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> talk mailing list
>>>> talk at nblug.org
>>>> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at nblug.org
>>> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at nblug.org
>> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at nblug.org
> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk